Анали Правног факултета у Београду

основываются на началах скупщинской системы, автор обращает внимание на несоответствие с скупштинской системой прав Исполнительного веча Республики уходить в коллективную оставку и ставить вопрос о доверии. Автор полагает, что в рамках предстоящих конституционных перемен в Сербии следовало бы из существующего механизма отстранить элементы, находящиеся в нессответствии с концепцией скупщинской системы и ве него включить положения, способствующие ее более последовательному осуществлению. Точно также, следовало бы более последовательно провести на практике существующие, заложенные Конституцией, начала скупштинской системы. В этом отношении в статье приводятся конкретные предложения, сводящиеся в заключении к трем основным требованиям: 1) Скупштина должна стать главным образом рабочим организмом и быть под меньшим воздействием на нее со стороны исполнительных и управленческих органов. 2) Исполнительное вече Республики должно стать в большей степени подлинным политическо-исполнительным органом, а в меньшей правительством. 3) Воздействие органов управления должно менее ощущаться, а сами органы должны быть оперативными, компетентными и эффективными и теснее связанными с самой Скупщиной.

SUMMARY An attempt at consistent realisation of the assembly system The assembly system in the SR of Serbia Since the assebly system concept if differently viewed and explained, and since accordingly, there exist various approaches to the explanation of the problems of the assembly system in the SR of Serbia, the author first attempts to define the concept and character of the assembly system in general. Assuming it to be an entirely special type of system of authority the author emphasizes that the elements and characteristics of the assembly system should be sought in the principle of democratic unity of authority and its implementation. The present-day assembly system in the SR of Serbia, whose concept and mechanism is given the central place in the article, was developed upon assumptions provided in the 1963 Constitution. The author points out the basic intention which has come to expression both in the Constitution and in practice the establishment of the Republican Assembly as the highest body of autority and the establishment of social self-management in the Republic. Its position as such is assured by the concentration of fuctions, the extent of authority and the appropriate relationship with the political executive and administrative bodies, a relationship which has unavoidably affected the position and character of these bodies. The concentration of the normative function within the Assembly, the increased legislative activity of the Assembly in practice are of special significance. In this connection the author considers that the general authority of the Republican Executive Council to pass regulations for implementing laws does not cantribute to a consistent realization of the assembly system. The author also views in the same way the very marked, almost monopoly legislative initiative of the Republican Executive Council. Concluding that the relationship between the Aseembly and other bodies is also based on the assumptions of the assembly system the author points out the incongruence between the emphasized: fist, the Assembly should become more of a working body and to place questions of confidence with the assembly system. The author considers that in the forthcoming constitutional change in Serbia, the elements in disaccord with the concept of the assembly system should be removed from the existing mechanism, and the elements which contribute to its more consistent realization should be retained. It is also necessary to more consistently carry out in practice the existing assumptions of the assembly system _ provided in the Constitution. In this respect concrete suggestions are given in the article among which there should be

685

JE ДАН nOKYIUAJ ДОСЛЕДНОГ ОСТВАРЕЊА СКТОШТИНСКОГ СИСТЕМА