The Aryan origin of the alphabet : disclosing the Sumero-Phœnician parentage of our letters ancient & modern

60 ARYAN ORIGIN OF THE ALPHABET

R were presumably too few to form separate groups. The position of the R immediately after the Q suggests that the sound of that letter was guttural—the guttural R. The concluding letter Z, the sibilant, appears to have been perhaps regarded by the Romans as a dental, and significantly the Z sign is often rendered by the dental D by Egyptologists + and Tch by others.?

This fixed alphabetic order was, no doubt, conduced to by the early practice of giving numeral values to the letters according to their relative position in the alphabet, thus A=1, B=2 and so on; and this practice was adopted from the Phcenicians along with the Sumerian letters by the Semites, as seen, for instance, in the order of the books of the Old Testament, and especially in the rr1gth Psalm. Here it is noteworthy that the Sumerian A sign possessed the value of ‘‘ One’’* in the Sumerian, long anterior to the formation of the Cadmean and “Semitic” Phcenician alphabets ; and similarly A had also this numeral value in Egyptian. But none of the other Sumerian signs which are disclosed to be the parents of the alphabetic letters appear to have possessed numeral values in Sumerian except a very few, and these are not according to their “ Phcenician ” values, thus I = 5 and U = 1o.5

lsh st, 2 BD. 893 f.

8 See Dict. (WSAD.), and Br. 6542, 6549. It presumably derived this value as a contraction for A$, “one” or “ace,” but it is given the equivalency of the Water-sign A, 7.e., the source of the letter A.

4 See Dict. (WSAD.), and BD. 1o5a@; and it is by the same Hand-sign as in the Sumerian.

5 Br. 12,192, 8677.