Анали Правног факултета у Београду

939

рад YHYTPAIIIH.E АРБИТРАЖЕ Y ПРЕДУЗЕВУ

ненного труда. Принимая во внимание права, предоставляемые Аополнениями Конституции основным организациям, нет сомнений, что Арбитраж будет необходимым в каждом предприятии. Невозможно представить себепредприятие, у которого не было бы органа, ведующего разрешением споров, возникающих между основными организациями. Материальные интересы в возбтждении споров и успех в спорах, до сих пор ему недостающие, теперь становятся главнейшей целью. Можно с уверенностью сказать, что Арбитраж станет самоуправляющимся судом в трудовых организациях, занимая место и играя роль, принадлежащие ему в нашей системе самоуправления. SUMMARY Characteristics of the functioning of internal arbitration in the enterprise Internai arbitration in an enterprise (here/after Arbitration) was introduced by the Basic Law on Eneterprises, 1965 (hereafter-the Law). There hâve been four phases in its development. The first period represented ingnorance of Arbitration. Bureaucratic-conservative forces (especially in enterprises) prevented its opération in any possible way. Arbitration was proclaimed an unneeded body which diminished the significance and rôle of other bodies in the enterprise. The second period represented a renaissance of Arbitration. Almost every enterprise formed Arbitration which heared ail disputes rangning from the smallest to the biggest. Fuies were enacted on Arbitration. The Law on Amendments to the 1968 Law provided for changes in Arbitration as well. A member of Arbitration can be a person who does not work in the respective enterprise. If there is no consent among the members of Arbitration, a chairman of Arbitration is to be appointed by the President of the District Economie Court. Décisions in disputes between working units juristic persons arrived at throught Arbitration are legally binding and their enforcement is entrusted to a District Economie Court. The possibility of repealing a décision by Arbitration was introduced. Ail this raised the rôleand significance of Arbitration so that Arbitration began to solve disputes which had not been placed under the compétence of other self-managing bodies in the enterprise (most often housing disputes). The third period was characterizes by a serions decrease of disputes placed before Arbitration. There were two main reasons for this. First, thèse were shortcomings in the self-managing System on the whole, (especially in connection with income relations in the enterprise) that is, shortcomings in the work of Arbitration itself. Secondly, self-managing forces in an enterprise learned that it was easier and chearer to solve many disputes by self-managing agreement. To this end some of enterprises introduced an obligatory preliminary procédure for the peaceful seulement of disputes. The fourth period began by the enaetment of the Constitutional amendments in 1971, that is, by constituting basic organizations of associated work in the enterprise. Bearing in mind the rights given by the Constitutional amendments to organizations there is no doubt that Arbitration will be necessary for any enterprise. It is impossible to conceive of an enterprise that has not its own body for solving disputes arising between basic organizations. The material interest for arbitrating disputes, and the success of this process which was hitherto missing has now become dominant. It iscertain that Arbitration will become a self-managing court in a working or ganization, filling the place and rôle which it deserves in the Yugoslav selfmanaging System.