Право и привреда

u unutrašnjoj organizaeiji preduzcća, sistemu rukovodenja, internim i eksternim odnosima. Bitno je ukazali da puka promena svojinske strukturę nije dovoljna, ako pri tome nema i odgovarajuće promene u upravljanju i rukovođenju, ili u dodalnom ulaganju slranog kapitała. Konačno, sam pojam druStvenc svojine pretpeo je bitne promene sa propisima o transformaciji društvenog kapitała. Pojedini subjekti dobili su znatno Sira ovlašćcnja u odnosu na društvena sredslva. Preduzeće je ovlašćeno da proda celokupan družtvcni kapital i lako promeni status pređuzeća. Široka ovlašćenja siekła je i država preko svojih agencija i fondova. Tako u ovom trenulku društvena svojina pre polpunog ukidanja ima karaklerislike zajedničke svojine preduzeća iii elementu državne svojine.

Summary

Property transformation in the former socialist countries

This paper explains the problems and initial experiences in transformation of the socialist, ic. the social properly. Several issues still remain open, especially the dilemma about rapid or gradual privatisation, about the aim of property transformations etc. It has been particularly emphasized that a mere change of property structure would not yield the expected results without a change in administration and management and also without additional investment of capital. The regulations on the transformation of social capital have altered the legal nature of social property. Certain subjects have acquired considerable powers in relation to the social means so that the social property is acquiring, before its final extinction, the elements of common property or the elements of state property. Key words; socialist property, privatisation, management, capital, shares.

64

Pravo i privreda 1/2 1993. vol 31