Анали Правног факултета у Београду

738

АНАЛИ ПРАВНОГ ФАКУЛТЕТА

повременно знакомит с некоторыми своими предложениями. Он, в частности, затрагивает следующие вопросы: строгое правое разделение между регистрованным браком и постоянным совместным сожительстом отрицательно сказывается на свободное принятие решения стать родителями; материальные и формальные условия заключения брака в меньшей степени затрудняют планирование семьи; институт развода брака и судебное производство о расторжении брака содержат серьезные недостатки; положения закона об алиментах не обеспечивают достаточную надежность и представляют собой серьезные помехи для урегулирования семейных отношений; институт усыновления на практике не дал почти никаких результатов вследствии отсутствия полного усыновления; положения о других формах защиты детей (обеспечение питанием и совместная жизнь в семье) не объединены в единую систему защиты детей, не имеющих родителей; нет положений об искусственном оплодотворении и об его юридических последствиях и, наконец, имеются определенные изъяны в положениях о попечительстве. Автор заканчивает статью заключением и обращает внимание на предложения, изложенные им в данной статье. SUMMARY The family law and the family planning The author tries to determine the influence of the familv law on policy and practice of the family planning. It ih his opinion that three grount of Questions should be asked in the attemot to determine this relation: 1. What is understood under the term »family planning«?; 2. What is the general attitude of the positive family law in Yugoslavia towards the familv planning like?: 3. Which institutions in the frame of the family law impede this planning?. In the answer to the first question the author notes that three facts are understood as the family planning in the Yugoslav society: 1. it is the basic human right of parents to decide freely and with responsibiltv when and how much children they are going to have; 2. the social comrnunitv should establish the real preconditions (social, economic, educational, health, democratic and legal) for the realization of this human right, and 3. the potential parents have to be directly involved themselves in the creation of the social Policy and its realization in the field of the family planning. In that way, the basic components of this policy have to be: the individual, social and self-managing ones. In determining the general orientation of the familv law in Yugoslavia, the author ascertains that it basically expresses the democratic and human concents on the family and marriage and provides for the almost all legal preconditions for the free porenfhood. However, he points out to some shortcomings in providing fort he individual as well as the self-managing component. He particularly points out to a) the lack of an unioue Code on the familv that would make the policy of the familv planning more effective; b) the predominantlv declaratory character and the insufficient effectivess of the positive familv law; c) the incomplete integration of the iudicial procedure with skilled social work. He also considers that principle of connecting the familv with self-managing institutions of our society could be applied consistently through the norms of the family law. In the third part, the author makes a detailed analysis of the certain familv law institutions representing an impediment to the free and responsible familup fanning and offers some suggestions. He particularly points out to the following questions: the rigorous legal separation of the marriage and permanent common law marriage has a negative effect on the free